Success at Work: Techniques: Computer Literacy

It's hard to believe that there are people in today'sintroduced him to Computer Automated Engineering
workforce who don't know how to use a computer. In(CAE). I showed him how to drag electronic
today's society, being computer illiterate is equivalent tocomponents from a library, use the mouse to draw
being functionally illiterate. Obviously no one reading thiscircuit paths, make the computer simulate the function
article is computer illiterate, but maybe you knowof the circuit, and then make the computer layout a pc
someone who thinks they can avoid computers andboard for the circuit.He was able to easily master
still be successful at work.Let me tell you a storycomplex technology because he now understood that
about a good friend of mine back when I worked athe wasn't stupid. Computers ARE complex. When he
Motorola. The company moved the manufacturing ofneeded help, he studied the help files or asked
automobile alternators offshore, resulting in his transfersomeone for help. Eventually, his CAE skills became
to my department. Although he had about 20 yearsknown and I lost him to another manager. "His last stop
with the company, this was to be his last stop beforebefore being booted out the door?" I don't think so.
being booted out the door.He was assigned to me asThere's no way Motorola is going to let this valuable
an Electronics Technician, and the first assignment thatemployee get away.Even though it's the programmers
I gave him was to lay out a small printed circuit (pc)fault that computers and software are too complex,
board. It was a tiny circuit for a tester, so computerthat doesn't relieve you of all responsibility. You must
drafting was not required. He could just sketch it outmake an effort. Like my friend at Motorola, you must
on paper. After several days, he came back to mestudy the help files or ask someone for help when you
explaining that he didn't have the technical ability to layneed it. Not only must you study the help files, but you
out a pc board.An Electronics Technician that couldn'tmust also be willing to "try things".Many people fear
lay out a simple pc board? Don't all Electronicsthat if they click on the wrong thing, the computer will
Technicians make little hobby circuits at home? Atblow up and they will be blamed for it. A properly
least all the technicians I knew did.I explained that hedesigned software application prevents the user from
needed to draw outlines of the components and thenmaking a fatal mistake, either by making it impossible,
use the schematic to draw lines between theor by providing a warning message. A properly
components connections. Then, maybe rearrange thedesigned application lets the user "back out of" or
components if that would result in fewer crossingreverse any action. One of the best ways to learn is
paths. I also explained something much more profound,to "try things". If the computer blow ups because you
how to deal with the complexity of technology.Manymade a mistake, you're using improperly designed
people, when they come into contact with technology,software.When you're learning how to perform a
consider themselves too stupid to deal with it.function with a computer, if you expect you may need
Technology is only for geniuses and geeks.to perform that same function again, take notes. No
Sometimes technology is too complex, but it's notone will think you're stupid if you take notes. But if you
because people are stupid, it's because the technologykeep asking over and over again how to perform the
is poorly designed.For example, take software, like asame function, they will think you're too stupid to take
graphics program, spreadsheet or database. Is thenotes.When I worked at Motorola, I used a technique
intended user of the software a computercalled "strokes" to make symbols appear and move
programmer, or an average person? Thesearound the computer screen like magic. Some people
applications are intended for use by an averagecalled me the "Electronic God". How did I get so good?
person. If an application is too complex for the averageI tried things. I failed. I studied. I tried again. I understood
person, the application is at fault - not the user.Whythat technology IS complex. So what?In today's
are most computers and software applications toosociety, being computer illiterate is equivalent to being
complex for the average person? Because they arefunctionally illiterate. Make the effort to study the help
designed by programmers who are under pressure tofiles and to "try things". Don't get discouraged or blame
get the product out the door. Does the applicationyourself if you don't succeed on the first try. The
have simple, easy-to-use help files? Softwarecomputer won't blow up if you make a mistake. You
developers consider help files even less important thancan't be successful at work if you fail to embrace
application usability.- The bottom line is, people are notcomputers and technology.Copyright(C) 2004 Bucaro
stupid - computers and software applications ARE tooTecHelp.Permission is granted for the below article to
complex.In today's world, where workers are requiredforward, reprint, distribute, use for ezine, newsletter,
to use computers and technology, how can they dealwebsite, offer as free bonus or part of a product for
with the complexity? Back to the story about mysale as long as no changes are made and the byline,
friend at Motorola.After receiving my instructions, hecopyright, and the resource box below is included.
successfully completed the pc board layout. I then