Have fun with RC aircrafts


American Anti-war Sentiment, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam: Why We Have To Stay The Course

One of the most misleading arguments againstarmy that both the Soviet Union and the
the American involvement in Iraq today is theUnited States had helped to create -- was
false comparison many people make to thebeing turned against two long-time American
Vietnam conflict. Vietnam left a bitternessallies; Kuwait Saudi Arabia.Why are they
in our hearts that is both irrational andlong-time American allies? Because President
completely unnecessary. And now unscrupulousFranklin Roosevelt realized that the United
people are using that bitterness to fuelStates would need a secure supply of foreign
support for the anti-war movement.During theoil. So he arranged for a mutual defense
Vietnam War, Americans suffered through twotreaty with Saudi Arabia that has been
conflicts. The fighting overseas was no morehonored and in force for about 70 years.
bitter or sectarian than the disagreements wePeople don't invade Saudi Arabia because the
experienced among ourselves here at home.United States won't allow it, not because
The war was unpopular because the Unitedeveryone loves the Saudis.Nonetheless, like
States did not enter it with a goal to win orHitler before him, once Saddam set himself on
a strategy for resolving the core conflict.the path to war, he couldn't stop himself.
We invaded Iraq with the intention ofSo we fought the First Persian Gulf War to
toppling Saddam Hussein's government andstop the advance of Saddam's armies into
replacing it with a more peaceful, stableSaudi Arabia. We freed Kuwait in the
government.Presidents John F. Kennedy andprocess, but when the Kurds and Shiite Iraqis
Lyndon B. Johnson, who committed Americanrebelled against Saddam, we did nothing. The
forces to battle, viewed the Vietnam conflictfirst President Bush, like Presidents Nixon
as a proxy battle between the two superpowersand Reagan before him, simply walked away
(the United States and the Soviet Union). Tofrom a destabilized situation American
the Vietnamese, the conflict was always aboutforeign policy had created. When the world
whether the North would dominate the South.Inasked President Bush what should be done
fact, anyone familiar with Vietnamese historyabout Saddam, he said that was up to the
understands that for the past 1500 years theIraqi people. But when the Iraqi people
Vietnamese peoples have repeatedly foughtfailed to defeat Saddam's remaining forces,
each other in addition to outsiders. Thethe United States did nothing.Well, that's
conflict between North Vietnam and Southnot entirely true. We persuaded the United
Vietnam was deeply rooted in ancientNations to impose 12 years' worth of
rivalries and cultural distinctions.Today,sanctions on Iraq. Those sanctions, intended
people frequently criticize the Americanto punish Saddam for his bad behavior, had
exit-policy of "Vietnamization", by which wethe most direct impact on the Iraqi people.
substantially transferred the responsibilitySome non-governmental organizations have
for the conflict back to the Southestimated that as many as 50,000 Iraqi
Vietnamese. Many Americans believe the Southchildren suffered from malnutrition every
Vietnamese people did not stand up foryear (many of them dying from lack of basic
themselves. In reality, more than 240,000care). If the estimates are accurate, about
South Vietnamese soldiers died defending500,000 Iraqi children died during the years
their country.The truth of the matter is thatof the sanctions. If they are only 1/10th
the South Vietnamese were simply overwhelmedtrue, as many as 50,000 Iraqi children
by a more determined, better organized enemy.died.From 2002 to the end of 2005, fewer than
They were conquered by a neighboring, rival50,000 Iraqi civilians are believed to have
nation. From the days of Ho Chi Minh, Northbeen killed in the insurgency. So far,
Vietnam's goal was to conquer the south.history indicates that our peaceful policies
Ho's ambition was no different from the manytoward Saddam were deadlier for the Iraqi
kings and emperors who invaded southernpeople than the aftermath of our
Vietnam in past centuries.American foreigninvasion.Iraq today stands on the brink of
policy in the 1960s was strongly influencednew nationhood. Technically, like
by the Domino Theory. Thanks to PresidentAfghanistan, Iraq now has a new government
Franklin Roosevelt and President Harrythat has been sanctioned by at least a
Truman, we had seen how the Domino Theorymajority of its people. The insurgency in
could work in eastern Europe. We gave theIraq, unlike the Viet Cong insurgency of the
Soviet Union effective control over Poland,1960s, is not being directed by a foreign
East Germany, Hungary, Bulgaria, and otherpower which intends to invade and conquer
nations. When Communist influence becameIraq.Of course, it could be argued that Al
rooted in North Vietnam as well as China,Qaida would now very much like to see the
American leaders feared that all of AsiaUnited States leave Iraq before the new Iraqi
might succumb. Given enough allies, thegovernment can defend itself. But despite
Soviet Union might have proven willing toits widespread reach, Al Qaida is not a
start another world war.How realistic wascountry. Its leadership is not the seasoned
this fear? We'll never know. What we doleadership of a formal state government. Al
know is that American foreign policy wasQaida can no more restore stability to Iraq
based on the assumption that the Soviet Unionthan any well organized militia or street
intended to export its brand of communismgang would be able to.And that's the problem
throughout the world.Ironically, today's Iraqwe face in Iraq today. It's not that if we
was shaped in part by that American foreignstay someone will continue to drain our
policy. Because we feared Soviet use ofresources year after year. It's that, when
nuclear weapons, we used proxy nations towe leave, there will be no one to fill the
wage our wars throughout the 1960s, 1970s,vacuum -- except Al Qaida.For all the
and 1980s. Iraq became one of our proxiesbitterness between the United States and
after Iran fell into the control of AyatollahVietnam's Communist government, we have
Khomeini and his Islamic revolutionaries.nonetheless been at peace for 30 years and we
Because Khomeini's Iran humiliated the Unitedare now on the brink of normalizing
States and became hostile, we used Iraq torelations. Millions of people suffered
punish the Iranian people. At the same time,terribly in the wake of the fall of South
our support for Iraq ensured that the SovietVietnam, but the United States and other
Union didn't acquire more influence in thenations opened their doors to many refugees
Middle East (and it already had a proxy infrom South Vietnam. They have had a hard
Syria).The problem with using Iraq, or anylife, but they have been given an opportunity
nation, as a proxy is that Americanto start over.We Americans need to accept
leadership doesn't take into considerationresponsibility for our government's foreign
cultural values or conflicts. For example,policies. Those policies have fueled the
when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan,resentment that drives support to terrorist
the United States did not hesitate to providegroups like Al Qaida. But those policies
help to the Mujahedeen. We paid for theircreated the reasons we had to invade both
war against the Soviets, but we did nothingAfghanistan and Iraq.President Bush's
to ensure a quick defeat of Soviet troops.political enemies, bitter and resentful over
Instead, we helped keep the war going untilhis election to the Presidency in 2000, have
the Soviet simply became so tired of theceaselessly burdened the American people with
conflict they went home.Sound familiar? Thatpropaganda that is really only intended to
was what they did to us in Vietnam. Thehelp bring the Democratic party back into
Soviet Union supported North Vietnam in thepower. Virtually all of the major voices of
hope that we would get tired and go home.Whenopposition are long-time Democrats and
the Soviets left Afghanistan, so did we.supporters of the Democratic Party.There is
When we left South Vietnam, North Vietnaman old saying: in every war, the truth is the
began asserting its own agenda. Northfirst victim of the conflict. We are today
Vietnam no longer needed the Soviet Union.fighting many more conflicts than we faced 30
Afghanistan, on the other hand, had noyears ago. President Bush's policies may be
alternative to Soviet power. The variousno better than those of Franklin Roosevelt
warlords who had helped defeat the Sovietsand John Kennedy, but his hand is to some
attempted to form a new government inextent guided by their hands.Americans don't
Afghanistan but they fell to fighting amonghave to like President Bush. We don't have
themselves. Eventually, Afghanistan was leftto respect his intelligence. But we should
without a central government (much likenot allow political activists to hand us our
Somalia, another failed Americanfeelings on a platter of lies.But if we
experiment).The Taliban rose up to fill thechoose to walk away from Iraq before the
vacuum in Afghanistan, and because they hadIraqi government has a reasonable chance of
no support from America and no ties tosurviving, if we allow the Iraqi insurgents
American culture, they never became ourto do what the Viet Cong could not do, if we
friends. Instead, they befriended therefuse to accept responsibility for what we
extremely anti-American Al Qaida. So wehave done in the past, we'll have to return
eventually had to topple the Taliban in orderto Iraq when it has fallen into the wrong
to drive Al Qaida out of Afghanistan.We havehands.After the First World War, we refused
not yet had to return to Vietnam to driveto participate in the League of Nations and
anyone out of South Vietnam. In fact, we'resubsequently found ourselves embroiled in the
in the process of establishing normalSecond World War.We walked away from South
relations with the Vietnamese government.TheVietnam and now every petty conflict is
difference between Vietnam and Afghanistan iswrongly compared to the Vietnam war. People
that when we left South Vietnam, anotherregard America as weak, vacillating, and
government moved in and imposed its will onunreliable. Worse, they think we can be
the South Vietnamese people. When we leftbeaten just by waiting longer than we are
Afghanistan, no one cared enough to dowilling to wait.We used Iraq to punish Iran
anything.We used Iraq to weaken an enemyand only walked away after Saddam began using
state (Iran) just as we used Afghanistan tochemical weapons indiscriminantly. In doing
weaken an enemy state (the Soviet Union).so, we ensured we would have to fight Iraq in
This was the lesson we learned from Vietnam.at least two wars.We used Afghanistan to
When you don't want to fight a war, but youpunish the Soviet Union and then we walked
want to defeat an enemy, get someone else toaway without helping the Afghan people build
fight your enemy until the enemy can fight noa stable new government. In doing so, we
more.However, when the Iraq-Iran conflictlaid the foundations for September 11.If we
ended, the United States did nothing towalk away from Iraq today before it is time
ensure that Saddam Hussein, who had becomefor us to leave, we'll pay a heavy price in
used to mobilizing his people for war againstthe future. So history has shown us.We need
his neighbors, would stand down and become ato stay in Iraq simply because we should be
peaceful regional power. Saddam's ambitiontired of making horrendously bad
to control huge oil reserves (which had ledmistakes.Michael Martinez writes essays on a
him to attack Iran in the first place) ledvariety of topics. He also operates a
him to look south instead of east.Suddenly,popular network of Web sites devoted
the fourth largest army in the world -- anprimarily to science fiction and fantasy.



1 A B C D 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114