American Anti-war Sentiment, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam: Why We Have To Stay The Course

One of the most misleading arguments against thearmy in the world -- an army that both the Soviet
American involvement in Iraq today is the falseUnion and the United States had helped to create --
comparison many people make to the Vietnamwas being turned against two long-time American
conflict. Vietnam left a bitterness in our hearts that isallies; Kuwait Saudi Arabia.Why are they long-time
both irrational and completely unnecessary. And nowAmerican allies? Because President Franklin Roosevelt
unscrupulous people are using that bitterness to fuelrealized that the United States would need a secure
support for the anti-war movement.During the Vietnamsupply of foreign oil. So he arranged for a mutual
War, Americans suffered through two conflicts. Thedefense treaty with Saudi Arabia that has been
fighting overseas was no more bitter or sectarian thanhonored and in force for about 70 years. People don't
the disagreements we experienced among ourselvesinvade Saudi Arabia because the United States won't
here at home. The war was unpopular because theallow it, not because everyone loves the
United States did not enter it with a goal to win or aSaudis.Nonetheless, like Hitler before him, once
strategy for resolving the core conflict. We invadedSaddam set himself on the path to war, he couldn't
Iraq with the intention of toppling Saddam Hussein'sstop himself. So we fought the First Persian Gulf War
government and replacing it with a more peaceful,to stop the advance of Saddam's armies into Saudi
stable government.Presidents John F. Kennedy andArabia. We freed Kuwait in the process, but when the
Lyndon B. Johnson, who committed American forcesKurds and Shiite Iraqis rebelled against Saddam, we did
to battle, viewed the Vietnam conflict as a proxy battlenothing. The first President Bush, like Presidents Nixon
between the two superpowers (the United States andand Reagan before him, simply walked away from a
the Soviet Union). To the Vietnamese, the conflict wasdestabilized situation American foreign policy had
always about whether the North would dominate thecreated. When the world asked President Bush what
South.In fact, anyone familiar with Vietnamese historyshould be done about Saddam, he said that was up to
understands that for the past 1500 years thethe Iraqi people. But when the Iraqi people failed to
Vietnamese peoples have repeatedly fought eachdefeat Saddam's remaining forces, the United States
other in addition to outsiders. The conflict betweendid nothing.Well, that's not entirely true. We persuaded
North Vietnam and South Vietnam was deeply rootedthe United Nations to impose 12 years' worth of
in ancient rivalries and cultural distinctions.Today, peoplesanctions on Iraq. Those sanctions, intended to punish
frequently criticize the American exit-policy ofSaddam for his bad behavior, had the most direct
"Vietnamization", by which we substantially transferredimpact on the Iraqi people. Some non-governmental
the responsibility for the conflict back to the Southorganizations have estimated that as many as 50,000
Vietnamese. Many Americans believe the SouthIraqi children suffered from malnutrition every year
Vietnamese people did not stand up for themselves. In(many of them dying from lack of basic care). If the
reality, more than 240,000 South Vietnamese soldiersestimates are accurate, about 500,000 Iraqi children
died defending their country.The truth of the matter isdied during the years of the sanctions. If they are only
that the South Vietnamese were simply overwhelmed1/10th true, as many as 50,000 Iraqi children died.From
by a more determined, better organized enemy. They2002 to the end of 2005, fewer than 50,000 Iraqi
were conquered by a neighboring, rival nation. From thecivilians are believed to have been killed in the
days of Ho Chi Minh, North Vietnam's goal was toinsurgency. So far, history indicates that our peaceful
conquer the south. Ho's ambition was no different frompolicies toward Saddam were deadlier for the Iraqi
the many kings and emperors who invaded southernpeople than the aftermath of our invasion.Iraq today
Vietnam in past centuries.American foreign policy in thestands on the brink of new nationhood. Technically, like
1960s was strongly influenced by the Domino Theory.Afghanistan, Iraq now has a new government that has
Thanks to President Franklin Roosevelt and Presidentbeen sanctioned by at least a majority of its people.
Harry Truman, we had seen how the Domino TheoryThe insurgency in Iraq, unlike the Viet Cong insurgency
could work in eastern Europe. We gave the Sovietof the 1960s, is not being directed by a foreign power
Union effective control over Poland, East Germany,which intends to invade and conquer Iraq.Of course, it
Hungary, Bulgaria, and other nations. When Communistcould be argued that Al Qaida would now very much
influence became rooted in North Vietnam as well aslike to see the United States leave Iraq before the
China, American leaders feared that all of Asia mightnew Iraqi government can defend itself. But despite its
succumb. Given enough allies, the Soviet Union mightwidespread reach, Al Qaida is not a country. Its
have proven willing to start another world war.Howleadership is not the seasoned leadership of a formal
realistic was this fear? We'll never know. What we dostate government. Al Qaida can no more restore
know is that American foreign policy was based onstability to Iraq than any well organized militia or street
the assumption that the Soviet Union intended togang would be able to.And that's the problem we face
export its brand of communism throughout thein Iraq today. It's not that if we stay someone will
world.Ironically, today's Iraq was shaped in part by thatcontinue to drain our resources year after year. It's
American foreign policy. Because we feared Sovietthat, when we leave, there will be no one to fill the
use of nuclear weapons, we used proxy nations tovacuum -- except Al Qaida.For all the bitterness
wage our wars throughout the 1960s, 1970s, andbetween the United States and Vietnam's Communist
1980s. Iraq became one of our proxies after Iran fellgovernment, we have nonetheless been at peace for
into the control of Ayatollah Khomeini and his Islamic30 years and we are now on the brink of normalizing
revolutionaries. Because Khomeini's Iran humiliated therelations. Millions of people suffered terribly in the wake
United States and became hostile, we used Iraq toof the fall of South Vietnam, but the United States and
punish the Iranian people. At the same time, ourother nations opened their doors to many refugees
support for Iraq ensured that the Soviet Union didn'tfrom South Vietnam. They have had a hard life, but
acquire more influence in the Middle East (and itthey have been given an opportunity to start over.We
already had a proxy in Syria).The problem with usingAmericans need to accept responsibility for our
Iraq, or any nation, as a proxy is that Americangovernment's foreign policies. Those policies have
leadership doesn't take into consideration culturalfueled the resentment that drives support to terrorist
values or conflicts. For example, when the Sovietgroups like Al Qaida. But those policies created the
Union invaded Afghanistan, the United States did notreasons we had to invade both Afghanistan and
hesitate to provide help to the Mujahedeen. We paidIraq.President Bush's political enemies, bitter and
for their war against the Soviets, but we did nothing toresentful over his election to the Presidency in 2000,
ensure a quick defeat of Soviet troops. Instead, wehave ceaselessly burdened the American people with
helped keep the war going until the Soviet simplypropaganda that is really only intended to help bring the
became so tired of the conflict they went home.SoundDemocratic party back into power. Virtually all of the
familiar? That was what they did to us in Vietnam. Themajor voices of opposition are long-time Democrats
Soviet Union supported North Vietnam in the hope thatand supporters of the Democratic Party.There is an
we would get tired and go home.When the Sovietsold saying: in every war, the truth is the first victim of
left Afghanistan, so did we. When we left Souththe conflict. We are today fighting many more conflicts
Vietnam, North Vietnam began asserting its ownthan we faced 30 years ago. President Bush's policies
agenda. North Vietnam no longer needed the Sovietmay be no better than those of Franklin Roosevelt
Union. Afghanistan, on the other hand, had noand John Kennedy, but his hand is to some extent
alternative to Soviet power. The various warlords whoguided by their hands.Americans don't have to like
had helped defeat the Soviets attempted to form aPresident Bush. We don't have to respect his
new government in Afghanistan but they fell to fightingintelligence. But we should not allow political activists to
among themselves. Eventually, Afghanistan was lefthand us our feelings on a platter of lies.But if we
without a central government (much like Somalia,choose to walk away from Iraq before the Iraqi
another failed American experiment).The Taliban rosegovernment has a reasonable chance of surviving, if
up to fill the vacuum in Afghanistan, and because theywe allow the Iraqi insurgents to do what the Viet Cong
had no support from America and no ties to Americancould not do, if we refuse to accept responsibility for
culture, they never became our friends. Instead, theywhat we have done in the past, we'll have to return to
befriended the extremely anti-American Al Qaida. SoIraq when it has fallen into the wrong hands.After the
we eventually had to topple the Taliban in order toFirst World War, we refused to participate in the
drive Al Qaida out of Afghanistan.We have not yetLeague of Nations and subsequently found ourselves
had to return to Vietnam to drive anyone out of Southembroiled in the Second World War.We walked away
Vietnam. In fact, we're in the process of establishingfrom South Vietnam and now every petty conflict is
normal relations with the Vietnamese government.Thewrongly compared to the Vietnam war. People regard
difference between Vietnam and Afghanistan is thatAmerica as weak, vacillating, and unreliable. Worse,
when we left South Vietnam, another governmentthey think we can be beaten just by waiting longer
moved in and imposed its will on the Souththan we are willing to wait.We used Iraq to punish Iran
Vietnamese people. When we left Afghanistan, no oneand only walked away after Saddam began using
cared enough to do anything.We used Iraq to weakenchemical weapons indiscriminantly. In doing so, we
an enemy state (Iran) just as we used Afghanistan toensured we would have to fight Iraq in at least two
weaken an enemy state (the Soviet Union). This waswars.We used Afghanistan to punish the Soviet Union
the lesson we learned from Vietnam. When you don'tand then we walked away without helping the Afghan
want to fight a war, but you want to defeat an enemy,people build a stable new government. In doing so, we
get someone else to fight your enemy until the enemylaid the foundations for September 11.If we walk away
can fight no more.However, when the Iraq-Iran conflictfrom Iraq today before it is time for us to leave, we'll
ended, the United States did nothing to ensure thatpay a heavy price in the future. So history has shown
Saddam Hussein, who had become used to mobilizingus.We need to stay in Iraq simply because we should
his people for war against his neighbors, would standbe tired of making horrendously bad mistakes.Michael
down and become a peaceful regional power.Martinez writes essays on a variety of topics. He also
Saddam's ambition to control huge oil reserves (whichoperates a popular network of Web sites devoted
had led him to attack Iran in the first place) led him toprimarily to science fiction and fantasy.
look south instead of east.Suddenly, the fourth largest