World War II

"I give snatches; I describe episodes; I make-as itwithout support of historical facts that the author does
were-snapshots in time; I reflect personal recollections,not eagerly provide. It is important to note that
thoughts, experiences, and views of specificBroekmeyer did not intend to write a purely historical
individuals.." those are the words of Mariuswork enumerating bold facts, but rather portray war
Broekmeyer the author of Stalin, the Russians, andfrom the point of view of Soviet nation. No other
Their War, 1941-1945. This line represents the main ideapeople in the world got to experience Nazism from
of the book and its thesis. The author is providing thetheir native government; this emotional despair that
reader with authentic memoirs and thoughts of peoplewas present throughout military years was hanging
who lived through that horrible war and thus he isover a huge country and caused more suffering than
taking the reader closer to the battle field than ever.the Germans.
This book was not written to show readers specificUnsystematic anthology of memoirs does not satisfy
battles or military engagements of the Soviet Union inhistorical requirements and lacks a balanced and logical
WWII, but it was meant to be a mirror of feelingsstructure. This is a major weakness of the book, which
experienced by Soviet people during long years ofhowever does not make it less appealing in a sense of
hunger and suffering. The author has collected moregenuine facts and their variety for those seeking
than a thousand actual official records written byopinions from "the other side". Although, as was
almost five hundred persons in order to illustrate asalready said, this works is short of perspective view
vividly as possible horrifying impact which war had onand does not give an explanation of how this Soviet
ordinary Soviet people. Obviously such approachwar impacted the rest of the world, it does submerge
makes the book more believable, as the author himselfthe reader into the realm of fears and hopelessness
is not a former Soviet Union citizen and thus cannotthat were reality for Soviets as a separate nation. The
relate completely to their lives. Therefore personalpages of the book represent diary of a huge country
accounts of participants and also spectators, althoughin struggle with the Germans as well as Soviet
all people were a part of the bloody mess, give adoctrine. By writing in the language of emotion the
more profound truthful and authentic idea of what wasauthor omits many important political facts that would
really happening behind the iron curtain.be essential in a historical work. On the other hand, the
The variety of viewpoints from people of differentpossibility of seeing this war through eyes of
classes and occupations provides a deeperwitnesses leads to a more objective outlook on
understanding of situation during war period. The factproblems that Soviets were experiencing.
that Broekmeyer left collected data without almostThe initial idea of the author to show how horrible
any interpretation offers a strong evidence andWWII was for the Soviet people is definitely well
trustworthy source for investigation of war as theillustrated in the course of examination of first-hand
Soviets have seen it. The author relies basically on thisaccounts. On their basis he proves that WWII in other
information entirely and presents it to the reader incounties was completely different from that same war
such a vague state that the reader has to interpretthat was taking place on the territory of Eastern
data individually. Clearly this technique has strong andEurope. A great literary value of Stalin, the Russians,
week sides at the same time. People who areand Their War, 1941-1945 rests in the minds of
unfamiliar with the history of Soviet Union and war timecommon people as it was taken from real life.
would probably find it difficult to understand suchHistorical events could only be guessed in personal
collection of personal horrifying stories in terms oftragic accounts but such was the ultimate goal of the
history that was being built at that time. Readers will bebook and the author did succeed in portraying WWII in
able to only relate to the emotional aspect of the bookhis unique way.